Click to enlarge/reduce the GenoMap image Hide this GenoMap frame

Family Subtree Diagram : Barker J

PLEASE NOTE: If you do not see a GRAPHIC IMAGE of a family tree here but are seeing this text instead then it is most probably because the web server is not correctly configured to serve svg pages correctly. see http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/SVG:Server_Configuration for information on how to correctly configure a web server for svg files. ? Parent Parent Biological Child Parent Parent Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Parent Parent Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Parent Parent Biological Child Parent Biological Child Parent Parent Parent Parent Biological Child Biological Child Parent Parent Biological Child Parent Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Parent Parent Parent Parent Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Parent Parent Biological Child Biological Child Parent Parent Biological Child Biological Child Parent Parent Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Parent Parent Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Parent Parent Parent Parent Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child Biological Child (nine children) Marriage (ten children) m. 1839 Marriage (eight children) m. 1811 Marriage (five children) m. 1789 Marriage (eight children) m. 1760 Marriage (eight children) m. 1711 Marriage (a child) m. 1678 (a child) (seven children) (four children) (two children) (two children) Marriage (eight children) m. 1731 (a child) Marriage (two children) m. 1836 Marriage (two children) m. 1836 <1785 - 1873 Ann Mizen 87 87 name from marriage registration
https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Mizen-14 1821 Harriet Barker 1818 Martha Barker 1816 - 1899 Cornelius Barker 83 83 https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Barker-1890 - Please read, lots of potential info here!!! 1823 Emma Barker 1825 Robert Barker 1814 Philip Barker 1816 Mary Baily 1845 Henry Barker 1818 - 1870 Mary Ann Barrett 52 52 Possibly Mary Barrett 1854 Ann Barker 1856 John Barker 1858 Henry James Barker 1860 Elizabeth Barker possibly married George King (https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Barker-7647) 1863 Mary Barker 1848 John Barker 1855 James Barker 1856 Walter Barker 1859 Ellen Barker 1861 Alfred Barker 1812 Henry Barker 1789 - 1847 John Barker 58 58 1762 - 1837 John Barker 75 75 looks interesting? https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QSQ-G968-N5ND?i=9&cat=780255

Possibly remarried 3 years later (29/10/1813) to Sarah Overill (Cowell) ~1771 - 1808 Martha Stock 37 37 1740 - 1812 James Barker 72 72 1689 James Barker 1686 - 1731 Margaret Newton 45 45 <1662 Thomas Newton name from Margarets baptism record <1662 Margaret Patch name from daughters baptism record 1773 - 1773 Rachel Barker 1m 1m 1754 John Mizen ~1759 Ann Theake ~1737 - 1817 Mary Claydon 80 80 1827 Amos Barker 1794 Ann Barker 1802 Amey Barker 1797 Harriot Barker spelt Harriet on son John's baptism reg. 1791 - 1875 Elizabeth Barker 84 84 1768 Elizabeth Barker might be of interest? (widow m. 1814) https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-9968-NGSB?i=17&cat=780255

Also : possibly an illigitimate birth of son JOHN (23/1/1785) https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-996D-9773

Also possible infant death of another JOHN (25/10/1787) https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QSQ-G96D-97J2 1772 - 1772 Mary Barker 5m 5m 1766 Ann Barker marries James Lawrence 10/11/1790 castle Camps https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-996D-9795?i=478&cat=780255 1764 Amy Barker marries Thomas Bretton 18/10/1790, Castle Camps https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-996D-9795?i=478&cat=780255 1770 Margaret Barker 1776 Ruth Barker 1641 - 1711 Robert Barker 70 70 1640 - 1715 Mary Baker 75 75 ~1615 Robert Barker ~1615 Ellen 1644 John Barker 1646 Thomas Barker 1648 Ellen Barker 1675 Mary Barker 1679 Thomas Barker 1682 - 1683 Elizabeth Barker 1 1 1684 - 1758 Elizabeth Barker 74 74 1686 John Barker 1694 Joseph Barker 1714 Hannah Barker 1719 - 1722 Ann Barker 3 3 1723 Anne Barker 1726 - 1731 Thomas Barker 4 4 1690 Joshua Claydon https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Claydon-10 Elizabeth Ling https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Claydon-10 <1729 Sarah Claydon https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Claydon-11 Charles Claydon https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Claydon-7 ~1670 - ~1690 Frances Challis 20 20 https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Challis-148 1690 Charles Claydon 1715 - 1777 James Barker 62 62 <1713 Mary Bradford 1846 - 1905 Dudley Rebecca Barker 59 59 1849 Maryjane Barker https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Barker-7641 1841 Martha Barker https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Barker-7645 1845 Sarah Barker John Stock https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/2:2:3LBQ-BBV Elizabeth Pavit https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/2:2:3LBQ-BBV 1839 - 1842 Robert Barker 3 3 1840 Charles Barker ~1837 Elizabeth Barrett 1742 Anne Barker 1744 John Barker 1746 Amy Barker 1749 Benjamin Barker 1754 Mary Barker 1757 Margaret Barker 1760 - 1760 Sarah Barker 3m 3m 1716 John Barker 1712 Mary Barker Another record show her name to be Anne (not Mary) 1720 Thomas Barker Elizabeth Barrett Thomas Barrett 1838 John Barrett The baptism record has misspelled the entire family (dropped the last t) 1839 Emma Barker 1842 Charlotte Barker 1842 Robert Barker 1842 Harriet Barrett This John Barker (b. 1789) was mistakenly researched thinking he was the son of This John Barker (b. 1789) was mistakenly researched thinking he was the son of William Barker and Alice Ruse. It all began as a dyslexic error in DOB of 1789 vs 1798. William Barker and Alice Ruse. It all began as a dyslexic error in DOB of 1789 vs 1798. Check out https://www.wikitree.com/genealogy/Barker-Family-Tree-1888 Check out https://www.wikitree.com/genealogy/Barker-Family-Tree-1888 My theory now goes, William Barker (b circa 1758/9) is the illigitimate first born son of My theory now goes, William Barker (b circa 1758/9) is the illigitimate first born son of James and Mary. James would have been 18 or 19, too young to marry yet Mary is 2/3 James and Mary. James would have been 18 or 19, too young to marry yet Mary is 2/3 years older and would have been keen to have children. My guess is William was born years older and would have been keen to have children. My guess is William was born out of wedlock (over the border in Essex) and hence no religeous (Parish) records! out of wedlock (over the border in Essex) and hence no religeous (Parish) records! Created using GenoPro® Click for details.